Citizen · Money

A Friend Borrowed Money and Stopped Paying You Back. Here Is Your Actual Recovery Path

Vaksy Legal Desk · 18 July 2026 · 4 min read

If a friend borrowed money and stopped repaying, your WhatsApp messages and bank transfer records count as admissible evidence. Start with a formal demand notice through an advocate. If you have a signed IOU or written acknowledgment, you can file a faster summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Limitation Act gives you three years from the due date to file a civil recovery suit.

The WhatsApp Chat Is Not Useless. It Is Evidence.

Most people think an informal loan between friends has no paper trail, so there is nothing to do when the friend stops paying. That is wrong. Under the Indian Evidence Act (now largely restated in the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023), electronic records are admissible evidence, provided they are properly certified. A WhatsApp message where your friend says "will return the 50k by next month" or a voice note admitting the loan is exactly the kind of proof a court will look at. So is a bank transfer entry showing the amount left your account and reached theirs, a signed IOU, or even an email.

The first thing to do, before anything else, is gather this material and keep it safe. Screenshot the chats with visible timestamps and phone numbers, save the bank statement showing the transfer, and if there is a written IOU or promissory note, keep the original. Do not delete the chat thread even if the conversation turns unpleasant. Courts care about acknowledgment of debt, and casual message threads often contain exactly that.

Send a Demand Notice First

Before rushing to court, send a formal demand notice through an advocate. It should state the amount owed, the date it was lent, the repayment promise (if any), and a deadline, usually 15 to 30 days, to clear the dues. This step matters for three reasons. It creates a formal record that you asked for the money back. It sometimes works on its own, because a lawyer's letterhead changes how people respond to overdue debts among friends. And if the matter ever reaches court, judges expect to see that you tried resolution before litigation.

If There Is a Written Acknowledgment: Order XXXVII CPC

If you have a signed IOU, a promissory note, or a clear written admission of the debt, you can file a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure. This is a faster track built specifically for recovery of a fixed sum based on a written contract or negotiable instrument. The defendant cannot simply file a routine written statement and drag things out. They have to apply for leave to defend and satisfy the court there is a genuine dispute, not just delay. Cases without this shortcut go through a full civil suit, which can take years. A written acknowledgment is what unlocks the summary route, which is exactly why collecting that WhatsApp proof matters so much.

Keep in mind the Limitation Act gives you three years from the date the money became due to file a civil recovery suit. Do not sit on this for too long.

If Repayment Was by a Bounced Cheque: Section 138 NI Act

If your friend gave you a cheque toward repayment and it bounced, that changes the picture entirely. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act makes dishonour of a cheque issued for a legally enforceable debt a criminal offence, punishable with imprisonment up to two years, a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both. The process has strict timelines: you must send a legal notice within 30 days of receiving the bank's dishonour memo, then wait 15 days for payment. If nothing comes through, you have one month from the end of that 15-day window to file a criminal complaint before the magistrate. This route tends to move faster than a civil suit and carries real pressure, because it is a criminal proceeding, not just a money claim.

Lok Adalat: The Low-Cost, Low-Drama Option

For smaller amounts, or where you would rather settle than fight, Lok Adalats under the Legal Services Authorities Act offer a no-court-fee, quick-resolution forum. Both sides sit with a mediator-judge and try to reach a settlement, and any agreement reached is binding and enforceable like a court decree. It works best when the amount is modest, the relationship is worth preserving in some form, and both sides are willing to talk.

When Is It Actually Worth Pursuing

Be honest about the arithmetic. Legal notices, court fees, and an advocate's time cost money and months of effort. If the amount is small and you have no written proof at all, a strongly worded notice followed by mediation may be your realistic ceiling. If you have a signed acknowledgment or a bounced cheque, the odds shift heavily in your favour and pursuing it is usually worth it. If there is neither documentation nor a cheque and the sum is modest, sometimes the sanest move is to treat it as an expensive lesson and move on, while making sure you never lend informally again without at least a WhatsApp confirmation on record.

Every case turns on the specific paperwork, the amount involved, and how the state's court timelines are running, so the numbers above should be confirmed for your situation. Vaksy can connect you with a verified advocate on the platform who will look at your chats, bank transfers, and any cheque involved, and guide you through the right recovery route in your own language.

Get this reviewed for your case. General guides don't know your state, your facts, or your deadline. Vaksy matches you with a verified advocate on the platform who can review your situation and draft what you need, in your own language.

Talk to a Vaksy advocate →

New here? See how talking to a lawyer on Vaksy works →